Monday, March 28, 2016

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

After Superman’s (Henry Cavill) battle against General Zod (Michael Shannon) destroys part of Metropolis, several wonder if Kal-El should be considered friend or foe. The skeptics include a senator (Holly Hunter) holding hearings as well as Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck), an industrialist who lost employees during the event. Meanwhile, fellow mogul Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) gets his hands on some kryptonite found at the bottom of the Indian Ocean, conceivably to use it as a defense against future Kryptonian attacks. He draws the suspicion not only of Wayne but also of Diana Prince (Gal Godot), a mysterious antiquities dealer. Thanks to Luthor’s secret machinations, it isn’t long before the tide of public opinion is turned against Superman and he is brought into conflict with Wayne’s alter-ego, the vigilante Batman.

Despite producing a superlative Batman trilogy (Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight films) and failing at nearly everything else (The Green Lantern and Jonah Hex) during the past decade, DC cannot be faulted for wanting to create its own cinematic universe. Nor can it be faulted for turning to director Zak Snyder to serve as its Joss Whedon equivalent. For as dark and divisive as Snyder’s films are, they show a fair amount of reverence for source material, and the grim tone helps distinguish DC’s universe from Marvel’s. No, what DC can and should be faulted for is expecting the thrill of seeing beloved characters brought to screen to outweigh lackluster writing and incoherent plotting. That may have worked when superhero films were a novelty act, but it’s a losing strategy in today’s cinematic climate.

To put it simply, Dawn of Justice is a bit of a mess. Though it achieves its goal of setting up a Justice League film, it bites off a lot more than it can chew. Plot threads (for example, the need to save Lois Lane to prevent an apocalyptic future) are introduced and dropped with no explanation, important characters are shunted into thankless cameos (blink and you’ll miss Jimmy Olsen), and character motivations are left unclear. Presumably, the yet-to-be-released extended cut will remedy some of these flaws, but in its present form, Dawn of Justice sacrifices coherence for enough explosion-heavy action to make Michael Bay blush. Add to that a lack of memorable dialogue and the whole thing adds up to one very sloppy effort.

And yet, in spite of that, there are the trappings of a much better film waiting to be let out. For the most part, the performances do the characters justice. Cavill has evolved from reluctant/uncertain to more unambiguously heroic while Amy Adams brings the “intrepid” to intrepid reporter Lois Lane without sacrificing her credibility. While the casting of the newcomers produced a fair amount of backlash, Affleck excels as both Bruce Wayne and Batman. As the former, he convincingly pulls off grim and jaded; as the latter, he is a criminal’s worst nightmare. The character’s willingness to use firearms (and a fairly ridiculous appearance in a nightmare sequence) may rub fans the wrong way, but the brutal fighting style is reminiscent of the popular Arkham games while the armor he dons for the big confrontation evokes Frank Miller’s classic The Dark Knight Returns. Assisting him in this is Jeremy Irons as a pitch-perfect (if a bit more tech-savvy than usual) Alfred Pennyworth. Gadot doesn’t have a lot of screen time, but she makes the most of it, projecting mystique in her civilian identity and utter fearlessness in combat. If there is one performance that is off-key, it is Eisenberg’s Luthor. This is meant to be a younger version of the character, so his ebullience is explicable if somewhat off-putting. And while he does prove himself to be an effective manipulator, the rationale for his anti-Superman vendetta is underbaked.

In addition, while the finale remains overblown, the film does offer plenty of nicely choreographed action sequences. Beyond the titular fight (which does not disappoint), we’re treated to Batmobile chases and a character – Doomsday – that pushes Superman to his physical limits. The visuals get a nice accompaniment from Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL’s score, with Wonder Woman’s motif a particular standout. Snyder may be a style over substance director, but he at least makes sure to get the style right.

Speaking of substance, this film tries for some semblance of meaning. It poses the question, as much to its audience as to its characters, of whether super-powered beings should be admired or feared. Unfortunately, rather than truly giving this questions its due, the film reverts to unambiguous hero-worship the minute a bigger threat shows up. That, coupled with the tendency of non-powered characters to stand around uselessly in the face of disaster, undermines whatever introspection was at play here.

The Dark Knight, still the apogee of superhero cinema, famously closed by having commissioner Gordon tell us that Batman was the hero that Gotham deserves but not the one it needs right now. Well, in the case of Dawn of Justice, the inverse is true. After years of build-up, we deserve a better film. But if this does pave the way for bigger – and hopefully better – DC Extended Universe offerings, then it is the film that we need right now.


7.25/10

No comments:

Post a Comment