In the
woods of Maine, researchers and staff at the secret Institute subject children
who have been abducted for their telekinetic or telepathic potential to experiments
designed to unlock their abilities. Luke Ellis, a twelve-year-old genius from
Minnesota, is among the abductees. Though frightened and bullied by cruel
orderlies and indifferent doctors, he bonds with fellow captive Kalisha and
wins over staffer Maureen while trying to furtively learn as much as he can
about his situation.
Stephen
King has been writing so prolifically for so long that he’s achieved symbiosis
with some of the creators that he has influenced. He famously covered telekinesis
in Carrie and (less famously) took on
a gifted child trying to outmaneuver a sinister organization in Firestarter, traces of both of which can
be found in the Duffer Brothers’ Stranger
Things. The Institute, in turn, has
elements that will be quite recognizable to fans of the Netflix hit, right down
to the helpful cop with the checkered past (though Tim is both blander and less
grumpy than Hopper). Unlike his previous acts of self-plagiarism, however, The Institute does not read like a pale imitation.
Timely and taut, it does the classic Stephen King things (fire-forged
friendships, strong sense of place, tragic deaths, etc.) well while avoiding
the author’s more self-indulgent tendencies.
As a protagonist,
Luke is an interesting choice. He isn’t particularly gifted among the gifted
(at first), and this lack of dazzle allows for him to act as a quasi-audience
surrogate. But he is damn smart and tenacious, both of which give him a
fighting chance despite the enormity of The
Institute’s operations. He’s contrasted with the worldlier Sha, the more
rebellious Nicky, and the younger though more powerful Avery, the latter of
which he becomes fiercely protective of. The attention paid to character
reminds us that these are kids, not experimentation fodder, which makes the
Institute seem all the more heinous. And yet, for all the organization’s terrible
(and terrifying) methods and nebulous reach, King floats the possibility that
they may be acting out of a sincere belief in a noble purpose.
In recent
years, King’s work has sometimes suffered from a clumsy, heavy-handed treatment
of theme (see Sleeping Beauties). The Institute, which was not written
with detention camps in mind, still reads very much as a critique of U.S.
border policy without ideologically bludgeoning its audience. King also avoids
another recurring pitfall: unduly emphasizing a supernatural element that is
ill-explained. Here, the mechanics and purpose of the Institute’s test are held
back to sustain interest and tension, but when the time is right, we are told
as much as we need to know to make sense of the proceedings. King has written
plenty of doorstoppers, but The Institute
reads as if none of its 500-plus pages are wasted.
Suspenseful
and engaging with well-conceived characters, The Institute will appeal to King fans, Stranger Things fans, or anyone who simply wants to be on edge for
a few hours.
No comments:
Post a Comment