Teenaged Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) is a brilliant but troubled
outsider who struggles with his parents abandoning him at a young age. His
Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) leads Peter to his father’s former research partner,
one-armed Oscorp geneticist Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans). After sneaking off from
an Oscorp tour group led by his classmate Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone), Peter
wanders into a testing area and is bitten by a genetically modified spider. The
spider bite gives Peter extraordinary powers, but with great power comes great
responsibility.
It took years for Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man to come to the big screen, so it’s not surprising that
this film, directed by the impossibly aptly named Marc Webb, had a rocky production
history as well. Initially conceived of as the fourth entry in the ongoing
series, it ended up being a complete reboot after Raimi left the project. Given
the age (only ten years old) and the quality (solid, despite moments of
cheesiness) of the Raimi film, the first question that The Amazing Spider -Man
raises is “why?” The easy answer, of course, is money: Spidey is an iconic
character, and a new film means a marketing bonanza. But there are deeper
reasons that, while not quite rendering the film necessary, at least justify
its existence.
First, we need only consider the direction that superhero
films have taken in recent years. Both Christopher Nolan’s Batman films and the
works that makeup the Marvel Cinematic Universe had taken on an edgy, irreverent,
snappily comedic bent. The previous Spider-Man series - and the third film’s tendency
to wallow in angst in particular – did not fare well in comparison. The new
film, while still quite reserved in some regards, at least represents a tonal
shift.
Next, much like the Ultimate universe did for the comics,
this film has the opportunity to introduce the character to a new audience. When
last we saw him, Tobey Maguire’s Peter Parker had already settled into a career
as a crime-fighter and gained a degree of self-assurance. Garfield’s portrayal returns
Peter to his lonely science nerd roots, thereby making him an underdog that a
new (read: young) audience can more easily identify with. The film also gives
us a break from the exhaustive crush-on-Mary-Jane-who-is-later-kidnapped
formula (poor Kirsten Dunst) by swapping her out for Gwen, who proves to be a
more formidable character (and who came first in the comics anyway).
So the rationale is in place, but how about the execution? Amazing
has more than a few things going for it. We get an eyeful of breathtaking city
scenery as Spiderman zips from tall place to tall place. The action sequences
are competently filmed, and the Lizard (Connors’ villainous alter ego), while a
somewhat uninspired foe, at least did not come out looking ridiculous.
The acting also seemed quite earnest this go-around. Garfield
successfully brings out all of Peter’s flaws and complexities: the sarcastic
quips, the feverish dedication, and the complete lack of social graces
(something that he arguably overdoes – the constant stammering around Gwen
grows tiresome eventually). Stone and Ifans more than pull their weight, but it
is a pair of father figures who practically steal the film. Sheen transforms
Uncle Ben from a rather flat good-guy mentor/martyr to a deeply moral man who
struggles with the hand (surrogate parent to a kid a lot smarter than he is)
that life dealt him. Similarly, Dennis Leary takes the role of police captain
George Stacy (Gwen’s dad) and elevates it considerably. Stacy is usually depicted
as a benevolent, competent veteran who supports Spiderman’s crimesolving endeavors.
Leary maintains the competence, shaves some years off the character’s age,
makes the role more physical, and seasons it with his trademark sarcastic bite.
But while there is a lot to like here, the film is not
without its faults. While the Spiderman of the comics took decades to unmask,
this one can’t seem to keep his mask on for more than a few minutes at a time.
Then again, given how silly the costume looks here, it’s hard to blame him.
Further demerits go to squandering Sally Field as Aunt May. While the
filmmakers get credit for changing up the normal portrayal, they don’t give her
enough to do. This woman is supposed to be the source of Peter’s inner
strength.
For a movie that did not need to be made, The Amazing
Spider-Man acquits itself well on most counts. But while the myriad changes and
tweaks freshen a familiar tale, it doesn’t really resonate. The film is good,
yes, but hardly amazing.
7.75/10
No comments:
Post a Comment